segunda-feira, 3 de junho de 2019

Owners of small business in Davenport build their own wall around shop to protect against flooding

Click here for updates on this story

    DAVENPORT, Iowa (WQAD) — Some business owners in West Davenport are exasperated with the current flood protection plan that's leaving them to fend for themselves.

Cong Le, the owner of QQ Beauty Supply tells News 8 she was trying to get Hesco barriers from the City of Davenport to protect her inventory, but was told they were not given out to businesses, only city facilities.

"We have been going through two floods and we suffered a lot," she said, referring to Mississippi's historic rise and the time the Hesco barrier broke near East River Drive and Pershing Avenue exactly one month ago, on April 30. "So we think this time, we need to protect ourselves."

She checked into ordering Hesco barriers herself, but the cost was too much.

The Le family, including Cong, her brother Nam Le, two other sisters and even her mother and uncle got together and brainstormed.

"He had been building the first wall for the second floor and it collapsed," Cong Le said of her brother. "And he cried a lot."

They asked friends and neighbors about how to build a wall. Everyone pitched in ideas.

"So then he came up with this wall and I think it works very well," she said, adding that it took three days to build.

All the supplies came from Menard's, she said.

She said she was shocked but not surprised to read Davenport City Administrator Corri Spiegel's column in the Quad City Times stating that "Davenport's flood plan is not and never was intended specifically to protect businesses."

"I was not surprised, because they might think that small businesses are not important. But for me, we are part of the community," she said.

Cong Le says she understands this winter and spring season have been very hard on everybody, including the city.

"Maybe there so many things going on with them they haven't thought about this. But I take this opportunity to stand tall for the small businesses in this area, because I have been talking to all small business neighbors: They are upset about the floods. They were very stressed, like me. " she said.

Across the street, at her sister and brother-in-law's Oriental Food grocery store, and further down, at the Discount Tobacco, owners expressed a similar sentiment. They wondered aloud about a permanent solution.

"You're paying taxes, but not getting any benefits," said Bikram Thapa, the owner of the smoke shop.

Cong Le said she and neighboring businesses were thinking about how to protect their livelihoods, and the city needs to rethink the future as well.

"I really would like to hear directly from the City of Davenport, and all the small businesses," she said. "We need to have a meeting, sit down together and think about future."

Please note: This content carries a strict local market embargo. If you share the same market as the contributor of this article, you may not use it on any platform.

Trump Admin Waives Environmental Laws to Build Border Wall in National Monument, Wildlife Refuge

The fence at the U.S.-Mexico border is surrounded by cacti at Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument near Lukeville, Arizona, on Feb. 16, 2017. (Credit: Jim Watson / AFP / Getty Images)

The fence at the U.S.-Mexico border is surrounded by cacti at Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument near Lukeville, Arizona, on Feb. 16, 2017. (Credit: Jim Watson / AFP / Getty Images)

The fence at the U.S.-Mexico border is surrounded by cacti at Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument near Lukeville, Arizona, on Feb. 16, 2017. (Credit: Jim Watson / AFP / Getty Images)

× Trump Admin Waives Environmental Laws to Build Border Wall in National Monument, Wildlife Refuge The fence at the U.S.-Mexico border is surrounded by cacti at Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument near Lukeville, Arizona, on Feb. 16, 2017. (Credit: Jim Watson / AFP / Getty Images)

The fence at the U.S.-Mexico border is surrounded by cacti at Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument near Lukeville, Arizona, on Feb. 16, 2017. (Credit: Jim Watson / AFP / Getty Images)

The fence at the U.S.-Mexico border is surrounded by cacti at Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument near Lukeville, Arizona, on Feb. 16, 2017. (Credit: Jim Watson / AFP / Getty Images)

The U.S. government plans on replacing barriers through 100 miles of the southern border in California and Arizona, including through a national monument and a wildlife refuge, according to documents and environmental advocates.

The Department of Homeland Security on Tuesday again waived environmental and dozens of other laws to build more barriers along the U.S.-Mexico border.

Funding will come from the Defense Department following the emergency declaration that President Donald Trump signed this year after Congress refused to approve the amount of border wall funding he requested.

Barriers will go up at Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument, a vast park named after the unique cactus breed that decorates it, and Cabeza Prieta National Wildlife Refuge, which is largely a designed wilderness home to 275 wildlife species. The government will also build new roads and lighting in those areas in Arizona.

Environmental advocates who have sued to stop the construction of the wall say this latest plan will be detrimental to the wildlife and habitat in those areas.

"The Trump administration just ignored bedrock environmental and public health laws to plow a disastrous border wall through protected, spectacular wildlands," said Laiken Jordahl, who works on border issues at the Center for Biological Diversity.

The Department of Homeland Security did not immediately respond to a request for comment but has typically not said much about construction plans.

At Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument, row after row of cactuses decorate 516 square miles of land that once saw so much drug smuggling that over half the park was closed to the public. But illegal crossings in that area dropped off significantly in the past several years, and the government in 2015 reopened the entire monument for the first time in 12 years.

While Arizona has seen an increase in border crossers over the last year, most are families who turn themselves in to Border Patrol agents. The number of drugs that agents seize in the state has also dropped significantly.

But the government is moving forward with more border infrastructure.

The waivers the department issued Tuesday are vague in their description of where and how many miles of fencing will be installed. The Center for Biological Diversity says the plans total about 100 miles of southern border in both Arizona and California, near Calexico and Tecate.

In Arizona, construction will focus on four areas of the border and will include the replacement of waist-high fencing meant to stop cars with 18- to 30-foot barriers that will be more efficient at stopping illegal crossings.

The government has already demolished refuge land in the Rio Grande Valley of Texas and construction is set to begin any day. On one section of the Lower Rio Grande Valley National Wildlife Refuge, crews have used heavy construction equipment to destroy a mix of trees, including mesquite, mulberry and hackberry. Those trees protect birds during the ongoing nesting season.

According to plans published last year, the cleared land will be filled in and a concrete wall will be installed, with bollards measuring 18 feet installed on top.

After months of public outcry, Congress forbade U.S. Customs and Border Protection from building in the nearby Santa Ana wildlife refuge or the nonprofit National Butterfly Center. But it didn't stop money from going to wall construction in other refuge lands, nor did it stop the government from building in otherwise exempted land due to the emergency declaration, said Marianna Trevino Wright, the butterfly center's director.

"They're going to have to protect us in every single spending bill going forward, and they have to protect us against the state of emergency," Wright said. "And this administration has made it clear … that they don't want any exemptions."

sexta-feira, 31 de maio de 2019

Vermillion County student to build veterans memorial wall for Eagle Scout project

Vermillion County student to build veterans memorial wall for Eagle Scout project

Posted: May 30, 2019 10:47 PM

Updated: May 30, 2019 10:47 PM

Posted By: Christopher Essex

Speech to Text for Vermillion County student to build veterans memorial wall for Eagle Scout project

Below is the closed-captioning text associated with this video. Since this uses automated speech to text spelling and grammar may not be accurate.

indiana! a local student is working on a project to honor those who fought for our country.. peyton wood is working on his eagle scout service leadership project. he chose to make a memorial wall for veterans.. the wall will be made out bricks with the names of past and current service men and women... it will go near the current flagpoles on the south vermillion high school football field. it's a project wood says he came up with all on his own. "i feel like the veterans deserve so much more credit than they get. and they deserve all the credit in the world because they sacrifice so much for us. they sacrifice their time with family, their lives. and they deserve to be recognized. " you can have a brick honoring a service man or woman you know.. we've linked you to how you can

A Wall Street firm has sorted out how much Apple will make from its new credit card with Goldman Sachs

This summer, Apple is launching its much ballyhooed credit-card, in collaboration with Goldman Sachs. Within a few years, the card could reap as much as $1 billion in annual profits for the tech giant, with little downside risk.

That's according to new estimates from Wall Street research shop Alliance Bernstein, which analyzed the potential profit prospects of Apple Card and other new business lines against plateauing sales of the iPhone and slowed growth from existing services like iTunes, iCloud, and Apple Care.

Apple Card doesn't represent the largest revenue opportunity of the recently announced services — that distinction goes to the advertising and TV programs, according to Bernstein — but the card could wind up being some of the easiest cash Apple ends up pocketing.

Here's how the math breaks down.

The revenue split

There are several ways the fee-free card will make money— primarily via swipe fees and interest payments from customers who carry a balance — and if Apple's co-brand partnership is in line industry standards, the iPhone maker will take a percentage of the revenues.

Typically, this figure is in the 5% to 10% range, but as Bernstein points out, Apple is a premium brand and Goldman is a newcomer to the credit-card business, so the terms were likely sweeter for the tech company. Apple was also more intimately involved the technology behind the card, which integrates with the iPhone and Apple Wallet.

That notion is further reinforced by the fact that there were several bidders for the Apple Card partnership, and that Citigroup backed out after advanced negotiations over fears the card's consumer-friendly, anti-fee framework would make it a money loser, according to a report from CNBC.

"The split is likely more in favor of Apple given its relative negotiating leverage over Goldman Sachs," Bernstein wrote in the research report.

But how much revenue can the card generate? Bernstein notes that the two largest rewards cards today, the Chase Sapphire Reserve and the Amex Platinum, each likely earn in excess of $4 billion in annual revenue.

The analysts think it's plausible for the Apple Card to match this over time, though they're aware that doing so for a brand-new card "is obviously a high hurdle."

Millions of iPhone users and unmatched brand cachet give Apple an edge

What the Apple Card has going for it, Bernstein notes, is seamless integration via the iPhone and thus a massive cache of easy-to-reach customers, as well as "brand cachet" among those customers that "is obviously unmatched."

Bernstein estimates there will be roughly 935 million installed iPhones in circulation worldwide by the end of 2019.

Much of that user base is outside the US — only 42% of Apple's revenues came from the Americas region in 2018, according to financial filings — and the credit card will only be available in the US to start with. But the US alone still represents vast and wealthy group of customers.

Moreover, the instant cash-back feature along with a competitive 2% cash-back rate for digital purchases should make it popular with low- to middle-income customers.

If adoption is strong, the card could make Apple as much as $1 billion annually within the next three to five years, but Bernstein thinks "hundreds of millions" is a more likely scenario.

"This revenue should be almost pure profit to Apple."

Even if Apple takes 20% of the revenues — double the high end of the traditional co-brand range — that's $800 million a year if the card matches the success of the Sapphire Reserve and the Amex Platinum.

By comparison, Amazon's co-brand credit cards likely earn the firm $500 million to $1 billion annually, Bernstein estimated.

But the kicker for Apple is this revenue stream comes with with very little work or risk going forward.

Goldman Sachs is essentially paying Apple for access and marketing to its lucrative customer base. The bank will do all the work of operating the credit-card — assessing and managing credit exposure, dealing with angry or confused customers, and collecting bills from delinquent cardholders.

"This revenue should be almost pure profit to Apple, as Goldman Sachs bears all of the operational and credit risk for the program," Bernstein wrote in the note.

'Wall of Wind': How blasting +150 mph wind helps to build better homes before a hurricane

Most of the housing stock across Tampa Bay is built below the current building code and extremely vulnerable to hurricane-force winds. At FIU, the "Wall of Wind" blasts +150 mph winds to test building materials to help figure out how to build better structures.

Published: 11:22 PM EDT May 7, 2019

Updated: 11:19 PM EDT May 7, 2019

GoFundMe Border Wall Ordered to Stop Building Because They Didn’t Have the Right Paperwork

SUNLAND PARK, New Mexico—We Build the Wall, a privately funded effort to build a barrier along the U.S.-Mexico border, was told to stop building on Tuesday.

The cease-and-desist order represents a new obstacle for the group and its founder, triple-amputee veteran Brian Kolfage. Kolfage's crowdfunding effort became a cause célèbre on the right last December, when he rapidly raised $20 million on GoFundMe for the wall. So far they have built less than a half-mile of fence on the border.

Sunland Park Mayor Javier Perea said at a press conference the city issued a cease-and-desist order, saying it is in violation of city ordinances. George Cudahy, whose company owns the land where the wall is being built, submitted an application for a building permit last week. Sunland Park officials declared the application incomplete, Perea said, because it lacked a site plan development and included contradictory information around the construction.

For example, Perea said, city ordinances requires walls to be under six feet. The border stands at roughly 20 feet, with seven feet buried beneath the ground. Nor was a necessary environmental survey completed, he said.

"Safety is always a concern for the city of Sunland Park," Perea said.

Perea said that Cudahy and the group must come into compliance before they can resume construction.

We Build the Wall is actually constructed by Fisher Industries. President Trump reportedly urged the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to award contracts to build a border wall to Fisher Industries, whose CEO is a Republican donor and frequent guest on Fox News.  

The barrier lies about 60 feet on the U.S. side of the border. Land was leveled off early last week, with sections of the wall dropped into place on Friday evening. With the first piece erect, members of the We Build the Wall team high-fived each other, shouting "suck it losers!" into their cellphone cameras.

We Build the Wall's director of building operations, Mike Furey, told The Daily Beast before the cease-and-desist order it was a "test to show the government."

Kolfage fumed on Twitter after the order was issued, claiming that it was the result of "liberals trying to intimidate us!"

"BULLSHIT!" Kolfage tweeted. "They were on site on Friday and gave us green light to build!"

In a follow-up tweet, Kolfage urged his supporters to "keep donating."

Kolfage and his allies had repeatedly stressed the need to keep the wall's location a secret for as long as possible in order to circumvent legal challenges. In a March radio interview, Kolfage said he had to hide the location to avoid opposition from the American Civil Liberties Union.

"I wish I could name where it's at, but we can't name it because of the ACLU, these other liberals groups that want to sue us and impede our progress," Kolfage said.

Furey bragged they caught the ACLU off guard: "We caught them all flat footed!"

GoFundMe eventually offered refunds to donors after Kolfage changed the terms of the fundraising pitch, announcing that he would instead move the money to a nonprofit, We Build the Wall.

A number of Trumpworld immigration hardliners soon joined to We Build the Wall's board, including former Trump strategist Steve Bannon, former Milwaukee Sheriff David Clarke, and former Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach.

The GoFundMe donors who had kept their money began to grow nervous in early May, after We Build the Wall missed an April groundbreaking deadline without offering any proof that construction had started or announcing the wall's location. On Twitter and Facebook, donors complained about a lack of updates from Kolfage's group.

Donors were made more anxious by Kolfage's earlier efforts. Before launching the GoFundMe, Kolfage ran a number of conservative Facebook pages that promoted hoaxes and were eventually kicked off the platform. Kolfage also raised money for veterans programs at hospitals, but the hospitals said they had no records of the program Kolfage had fundraised for actually taking place.

How to fix our broken prison system: Build windows, not walls [Opinion]

Here in Houston, a downtown Harris County jail building sits on the banks of Buffalo Bayou, where it overlooks a steady stream of hikers, bikers and the occasional kayaker paddling down the brackish waterway. But "overlooks" may not be the right word. Many of the seemingly transparent windows that line the seven-story red brick building are fakes — architectural camouflage that helps make the jail appear like neighborhood-friendly lofts to any passing weekend warriors.

In reality, it's not so easy for the 3,500 people held within the walls to see out into the world, and outsiders cannot peek in. Consider it an all-too-appropriate design.

The individual buildings may look different, but jails and prisons across the country uniformly operate as opaque institutions. They have little accountability to the taxpayers who fund them, the individuals who are housed or work there, and the society they're supposed to serve. Outcomes are poorly tracked. Inhumane conditions within facilities go ignored.

Here's what we do know about prisons: Incarceration costs more than $80 billion each year. Prison growth since the 1970s has provided little benefit to public safety. In some cases, prisons may actually make crime worse.

Taxpayers are stuck paying a lot of money for bad results. By any objective standard, the U.S. prison system is a failure.

In counties, states and the federal government, Democrats and Republicans are working together on a bipartisan agenda to reform our nation's broken criminal justice system, focusing on policies that shorten unnecessarily long sentences or divert people from incarceration in the first place. However, any reform that stops at the prison walls will be an incomplete project.

As long as prisons and jails remain a part of our criminal justice system, policymakers have a responsibility to ensure that these institutions are run effectively, humanely, and with a focus on rehabilitation.

The mission won't be as politically friendly as releasing those with nonviolent drug offenses or helping veterans with post-traumatic stress avoid time behind bars. One-and-a-half million adults live in prisons, and not all of them are sympathetic cases. But there is near consensus across the country that sentences are far too long and all sense of proportional punishment has been lost.

Then there is this inescapable truth: 95 percent of people in prison come back to live in free society. Prisons fail at the important task of helping them reintegrate, and often leave people worse off than before their sentences — less able to make a living, less connected to their communities, more likely to re-offend.

So how can we fix it?

The first step is transparency. Prison reform is stymied by the profound lack of public information about and oversight of our prisons. In the rare instances when policymakers investigate beyond the bricks, you can almost guarantee they'll find a culture of violence and inhumanity.

Just look at Alabama. Earlier this year, the Department of Justice released an astounding 56-page report documenting the unconstitutionally cruel conditions of the state's prison system, including ubiquitous weapons and an unrelenting spree of rape and murder among the system's 16,000 male inmates.

The report specifically noted that the state failed to track violent deaths or adequately investigate sex abuse.

Alabama may be a worst-case scenario, but the problem is pervasive nationwide.

"If you look at the prison system in particular and corrections in general, it screws everyone up who touches the system," John Wetzel, secretary of the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, said at the Urban Institute last month. "And a big part of that is the system has been so opaque."

Wetzel was co-chair of a prison reform knowledge lab that convened 39 attendees - including myself - with the goal of discussing how we can reform, as Urban Institute Vice President for Justice Policy Nancy La Vigne put it, "one of the least transparent and most closed public sectors that we know of."

That lack of transparency was obvious in Chronicle reporter Keri Blakinger's recent article about David Witt - a 41-year-old prisoner who died after being slammed to the ground by a guard. Witt's family was unaware of the circumstances around his death for months afterward.

But millions of Americans don't need to read investigative reporting or hear expert testimony to understand the cruelty of our prison system. Like Witt's family, they've lived it. Half of all adults in America have experienced the incarceration of a family member, and one in seven have had an immediate family member spend more than a year behind bars. For families with brothers, fathers, sons and daughters behind bars, fixing our broken prisons is a personal cause — one that has multigenerational ramifications. They know in their bones how our prison system contributes to the very problems it is supposed to solve: breaking up social networks, depriving families of emotional and economic support and undermining the already precarious stability of poor and minority communities.

Prisons don't have an incentive to do anything else. Rehabilitation efforts go neglected in our laws and budgets. Policymakers lack the metrics to measure the reality of imprisonment. It is time to reimagine the fundamental nature of our prison system and rewrite the rules.

This means making a serious effort to improve living and working conditions in our prisons, holding administrators accountable for reductions in violence and progress in health outcomes, creating environments of respect among staff and residents, and making successful re-entry into society a top priority.

Prison reform used to be a political impossibility. Now there's an opportunity for change. We can't let the moment pass. Too many people, too many neighborhoods, too many families will continue to suffer. It is time to shine a light that can penetrate the brick walls of our prisons and ensure that the system works for everyone — taxpayers, staff, victims, and those serving sentences.

Rhee is president and chief executive officer of Arnold Ventures, which recently dedicated $17 million to support fundamental prison reform.